Invoking the Fathers: Dangerous Metaphors and Founding Myths in Congressional Politics

Why is the metaphor of the Founding Fathers so insidiousand how does it impact American politics?

American politicians routinely invoke the metaphor of the Founding Fathers when referring to the men who supposedly set the United States on a path to greatness. On average, the term Founding Fathers is uttered by a congressional member every single day that Congress is in session. Why is this metaphor repeated constantlyand what effect does it have on policy? In Invoking the Fathers, communication scholar Sarah Kornfield links this rhetorical strategy to the rise of patriarchal white supremacy and Christian nationalism in the United States.

Using the House and the Senate as the objects of her study, Kornfield traces the trope of fatherhood across congressional discourse and theorizes a rhetoric of sovereignty in which the founders' most obvious heirswhite Christian meninherit America and its governance. Congressional politicians use this metaphor in four ways: to supposedly advocate for rights and liberties, to demand checks and balances, to celebrate American exceptionalism, and to call for bipartisan politics. These four situations are all, at their core, disputes over what kind of nation America is or should be.

Metaphors are not harmless, Kornfield argues, and this one is particularly pernicious: the fatherhood metaphor is taken up and violently embodied by men's rights groups, white supremacist groups, and Christian nationalists. Ultimately, the book demonstrates how this gendered metaphor creates and reinforces a legislative system in which some are considered more equal than others.