Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform

Regular price €32.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=John Samples
Author_John Samples
campaign finance reform
campaigning
candidates
Category=JPHF
congress
constituency
constituents
corporations
corruption
democracy
elections
electoral competition
electorate
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
equality
fundraising
funds
government
incumbents
interest groups
law
legislation
lobbying
mccain-feingold
negative ads
nonfiction
party system
political science
politics
regulation
representation
soft money
unions
voter turnout
voting
wealth

Product details

  • ISBN 9780226734507
  • Weight: 652g
  • Dimensions: 16 x 23mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Oct 2006
  • Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Is campaign finance reform really good for our democracy? John Samples says no, and here takes a penetrating look into the premises and consequences of the long crusade against big money in politics. How many Americans, he asks, know that there is little to no evidence that campaign contributions really influence members of Congress? Or that so-called negative political advertising actually improves the democratic process by increasing voter turnout and knowledge? Or that limits on campaign contributions make it harder to run for office, thereby protecting incumbent representatives from losing their seats of power?Posing tough questions such as these, Samples uncovers numerous fallacies beneath proposals for campaign finance reform. He argues that our most common concerns about money in politics are misplaced, and that the chance to regulate money in politics actually allows representatives to serve their own interests at a cost to their constituents. And, ironically, this crusade against the corruption caused by campaign contributions allows public officials to reduce their vulnerability by suppressing electoral competition.Defying long-held assumptions and conventional political wisdom, "The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform" is a provocative and decidedly nonpartisan work that will be essential for anyone concerned about the future of American government.
John Samples directs the Cato Institute's Center for Representative Government and teaches in the government program at the Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C.

More from this author