U.S. Defense Planning

Regular price €179.80
A01=John M Collins
ABM Treaty
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Air Force
Author_John M Collins
automatic-update
Back Stop
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JP
China Burma India Theater
COP=United Kingdom
Defense Planning System
Delivery_Pre-order
Deputy DCI
Deputy SECDEF
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Hay Ward
Industrial College
Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan
Language_English
National Security Council
National War College
NATO Europe
NATO Territory
NSC Staff
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Politico Military Affairs
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
Rapid Deployment Joint Task Force
Resource Sufficiency
Salt Ii Treaty
softlaunch
State Department Planners
strategic intelligence
Strategic Research Community
Strategic Studies Group
U.S. defense planning standards
U.S. planning problems
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367212193
  • Weight: 810g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 16 Jul 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days
: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available
: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

Superior defense plans fuse political, economic, military, technological, and sociological power in ways that cover state interests, while conserving resources to the greatest prudent extent. Poor products can increase costs without reducing risks, because forces and funds that support slipshod schemes often fail to furnish security. This critical appraisal of the U.5. defense planning system seeks to serve a five-fold purpose: set assessment standards, appraise U.S. planning in principle, appraise U.5. planning in practice, identify U.S. planning problems and present optional courses of corrective action. The study shows how domestic and foreign policy inputs from the White House, National 5ecurity Council, and State Department affect defense planning.

John M Collins