U.S. Supreme Court and the Legitimization of Surveillance
★★★★★
★★★★★
Regular price
€46.99
Regular price
€47.99
Sale
Sale price
€46.99
A01=Pawe Laidler
A01=Paweł Laidler
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Pawe Laidler
Author_Paweł Laidler
automatic-update
B09=Marcin Grabowski
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JPA
Category=JPB
COP=Switzerland
Court
Delivery_Pre-order
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_new_release
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Language_English
PA=To order
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Forthcoming
softlaunch
Product details
- ISBN 9783631863916
- Weight: 364g
- Dimensions: 148 x 210mm
- Publication Date: 25 Nov 2024
- Publisher: Peter Lang AG
- Publication City/Country: CH
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock
10-20 Working Days: On Backorder
Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting
We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!
The book analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings in cases concerning
surveillance, both domestic and foreign intelligence, focusing on
how judicial activism or judicial restraint has legitimized the almost
uncontrolled surveillance of American citizens by government agencies.
The purpose of the research is to examine the judiciary’s impact
on the scope of government surveillance and, more broadly, on the
state of American democracy and the rule of law. By reviewing the
most important SCOTUS opinions on surveillance and applying the
famous “legitimate end” approach from McCulloch v. Maryland, the
author determines which values have prevailed in the judicial interpretation
of the Constitution: security or freedom. Furthermore, the book
evaluates the legal and political arguments used by the Court to justify
broad surveillance measures, including the national security paradigm
and secrecy, which have strengthened the executive branch’s position
in the U.S. governmental system.
surveillance, both domestic and foreign intelligence, focusing on
how judicial activism or judicial restraint has legitimized the almost
uncontrolled surveillance of American citizens by government agencies.
The purpose of the research is to examine the judiciary’s impact
on the scope of government surveillance and, more broadly, on the
state of American democracy and the rule of law. By reviewing the
most important SCOTUS opinions on surveillance and applying the
famous “legitimate end” approach from McCulloch v. Maryland, the
author determines which values have prevailed in the judicial interpretation
of the Constitution: security or freedom. Furthermore, the book
evaluates the legal and political arguments used by the Court to justify
broad surveillance measures, including the national security paradigm
and secrecy, which have strengthened the executive branch’s position
in the U.S. governmental system.
Paweł Laidler is Professor of political science at the Jagiellonian
University in Krakow, Poland, and an expert in American studies and
law. He has written books and articles on U.S. constitutionalism, the
judicialization of politics, federal election campaigns, and surveillance.
Laidler has also been a visiting scholar and researcher at American and
European universities, including the Catholic University of America,
SDSU, and Freie Universität Berlin.
University in Krakow, Poland, and an expert in American studies and
law. He has written books and articles on U.S. constitutionalism, the
judicialization of politics, federal election campaigns, and surveillance.
Laidler has also been a visiting scholar and researcher at American and
European universities, including the Catholic University of America,
SDSU, and Freie Universität Berlin.
Qty: