Why It's OK to Be Amoral | Agenda Bookshop Skip to content
A01=Ronald de Sousa
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
amorality
atavism
Author_Ronald de Sousa
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=HRAM1
Category=QDTQ
Category=QRAM1
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Pre-order
eq_isMigrated=2
Language_English
moral conviction
moral passion
moral principles
moral truth
moralism
PA=Not yet available
Price_€100 and above
PS=Forthcoming
self-righteousness
social convention
softlaunch

Why It's OK to Be Amoral

English

By (author): Ronald de Sousa

Why It’s OK to Be Amoral argues that self-righteous moralism has replaced religion as a source of embattled and gratuitous certainties. High-minded moral convictions invoke the authority of sacred moral truths, but there are no such truths. In reality, moral passions are rooted in atavistic emotional dispositions and arbitrary social conventions.

While public and private discourse is saturated with guilt, shame and righteous indignation, professional philosophers, under cover of clever argumentation, promote the utopian idea that all practical questions have uniquely right answers—providing that you adopt the right moral principles. But their justifications for those principles appeal to contested ‘foundations’, among which no rational adjudication is possible. Moreover, because there are two discrepant ways of understanding motivation, our access to agents’ true reasons is never sufficiently reliable to warrant moral praise or blame. Finally, every agent has a wide diversity of reasons for action, yet moralists claim that some reasons trump all others, because they are ‘moral’ reasons. Since these too must be grounded in facts, that amounts to double counting some reasons.

Having exposed these aspects of the institution of morality, this book suggests that if we cannot abstain altogether from moralising, we can at least try to use it against itself.

Key Features

  • Describes and criticises seven approaches to the question, Why should I do or not do X?
  • Develops an original objection to the idea of identifying a domain of moral reasons: namely, that it amounts to the unwarranted double counting of a subset of our reasons.
  • Describes two ways of thinking about reasons and choices, and explains how the discrepancy between them makes it impossible to assess an agent’s motivation reliably enough to warrant moral praise or blame.
  • Outlines the subtle changes in attitude involved in espousing amoralism, without giving up on rational choices and honest political commitments.
See more
Current price €132.99
Original price €133.99
Save 1%
A01=Ronald de SousaAge Group_UncategorizedamoralityatavismAuthor_Ronald de Sousaautomatic-updateCategory1=Non-FictionCategory=HPQCategory=HRAM1Category=QDTQCategory=QRAM1COP=United KingdomDelivery_Pre-ordereq_isMigrated=2Language_Englishmoral convictionmoral passionmoral principlesmoral truthmoralismPA=Not yet availablePrice_€100 and abovePS=Forthcomingself-righteousnesssocial conventionsoftlaunch

Will deliver when available. Publication date 29 Nov 2024

Product Details
  • Weight: 540g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Nov 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Language: English
  • ISBN13: 9781032235554

About Ronald de Sousa

Ronald de Sousa, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Toronto, was born in Switzerland and educated at New College, Oxford (BA) and Princeton (PhD). He is the author of The Rationality of Emotion (1987), Why Think? Evolution and the Rational Mind (2007), Emotional Truth (2011) and Love: A Very Short Introduction (2015). A number of his interviews and debates are available on YouTube.

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue we'll assume that you are understand this. Learn more
Accept