Converging Post-War European Discourse

Regular price €173.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Thomas C. Hoerber
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Thomas C. Hoerber
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JPB
Category=JPQB
Category=JPS
Category=KCP
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Discourse Theory
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
European Integration
European Post-War History
European Studies
International Relations
Language_English
Military Studies
PA=Available
Parliamentary Debates
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
Security
Security Studies
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9780739192122
  • Weight: 794g
  • Dimensions: 162 x 232mm
  • Publication Date: 24 Dec 2014
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book explores the most important components and contributing factors to the European integration process during the 1950s. It seeks to combine comparative politics and political history to examine core themes such as war experience, national security, military security, economic security, societal security, and research and education in three major European countries, i.e. France, Germany, and Britain. It analyses the references to the ensuing European integration process in national parliamentary debates, analyzing which national needs were thought European integration could cater to, but also which national positions were seen as being compromised by a closer European commitment. The development of a national position on European integration and in turn the evolution of European concepts are considered by using discourse theory on parliamentary debates in France, Germany, and Britain.

Parliamentary discourses are shown to be an ideal source for analyzing grand themes, such as European integration, because they cover all fundamental ideas; they have to be public and open-ended deliberations which in turn determined the position of each country towards European integration. The great variety of positions reflected in the parliamentary discourse, in particular those which did not prevail and which did not find their way into the commonly accepted historical storyline of European integration, provide a greater comprehensiveness and a better understanding of the history of the European integration process.

Thomas Hoerber is professor at the Centre of European Integration, LUNAM University, ESSCA – School of Management.

More from this author