Home
»
National Developmental and Negotiated Approach to School and Curriculum Evaluation
National Developmental and Negotiated Approach to School and Curriculum Evaluation
★★★★★
★★★★★
Regular price
€126.99
A01=Mei Kuin Lai
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Mei Kuin Lai
automatic-update
B01=Saville Kushner
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JNDG
Category=JNDH
Category=JNKC
Category=JNKD
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Language_English
PA=Available
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
softlaunch
Product details
- ISBN 9781781907047
- Weight: 590g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 31 Oct 2013
- Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock
10-20 Working Days: On Backorder
Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting
We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!
Current conventions in school evaluation focus on accountability, control and compliance. New Zealand offers a distinctive, systemic alternative to school self-evaluation, with developmental and negotiated approaches ingrained throughout the education system, from school inspection to major government schooling improvement initiatives. In New Zealand there is no national testing, other than a Ministry-sponsored (voluntary) formative assessment system designed for school and teacher self-evaluation. This is a form of professional and program evaluation where there is shared power and responsibility between evaluators and those being evaluated. Through a detailed national case study of New Zealand, together with commentaries from international specialists, this volume examines the successes and challenges of this approach to programme evaluation and its generalizability to other educational and professional review settings, and show how education systems can recover a balance between an achievement agenda and a focus on educational quality.
Qty:
