Act and Object of Judgment

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
act
Act Object Analysis
Act Product Distinction
affirmation
Alexandra Newton
analytic philosophy
Attitudinal Objects
Bolzano
Bolzano's Account
Bolzano's Theory
Bolzano’s Account
Bolzano’s Theory
Brentano
Brian Ball
Category=QDTK
Christopher Peacocke
circumstance
Conatus Doctrine
Daniel Morgan
epistemic justification
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Error Theory
extensionalism
feelings
Frege
Frege Geach Problem
Friederike Moltmann
Grice
Hegel
historical theories of judgment
Illocutionary Acts
Individuating Condition
Indrek Reiland
Infinite Judgment
Intellectual Seemings
intentionality
intentionality in cognition
Jordan Curve Theorem
judgement
judgment
Kant
Kazimierz Twardowski
knowledge
Leibniz
logic
logical inference
Maria van der Schaar
Mark Textor
Martin Lin
mental acts theory
modal objects
modality
Multiple Relation Theory
non-propositional judgment
object
Paul Redding
Peter Simons
philosophy of mind
predication
Predicative Unity
proposition
propositional attitudes
reason
reasons
Relevant Act Types
Russell
Sandra Lapointe
Self-evident Judgments
Simon Blackburn
Spinoza
Spinoza's Psychology
Spinoza’s Psychology
Synthetic Judgment
tense
Transcendental Logic
Truthmaker Theory
Twardowski
Unasserted Propositions
utterances
Vice Versa
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138351387
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 07 Mar 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book presents 12 original essays on historical and contemporary philosophical discussions of judgment. The central issues explored in this volume can be separated into two groups namely, those concerning the act and object of judgment. What kind of act is judgment? How is it related to a range of other mental acts, states, and dispositions? Where and how does assertive force enter in? Is there a distinct category of negative judgments, or are these simply judgments whose objects are negative? Concerning the object of judgment: How many objects are there of a given judgment? One, as on the dual relation theory of Frege and Moore? Or many as in Russell’s later multiple relation theory? If there is a single object, is it a proposition? And if so, is it a force-neutral, abstract entity that might equally figure as the object of a range of intentional attitudes? Or is it somehow constitutively tied to the act itself? These and related questions are approached from a variety of historical and contemporary perspectives. This book sheds new light on current controversies by drawing on the details of the distinct intellectual contexts in which previous philosophers’ positions about the nature of judgment were formulated. In turn, new directions in present-day research promise to raise novel interpretive prospects and challenges in the history of philosophy.

Brian Ball is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at New College of the Humanities, London, and Associate Member of the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Oxford; he was previously Lecturer in Philosophy at Balliol College, Oxford (2014–2016), and at St Anne’s College, Oxford (2008–2014). He works in the philosophies of mind and language, epistemology, and metaphysics, and has published papers in these areas in journals including Analysis, Erkenntnis, Mind and Language, Philosophical Psychology, and Philosophical Quarterly. Christoph Schuringa is Lecturer in Philosophy at New College of the Humanities, and has recently been a visiting scholar at the Universities of Leipzig and Pittsburgh. He works in the history of German philosophy and in practical philosophy, and has published in journals including History of Philosophy Quarterly and International Yearbook of Hermeneutics.