Advocating Weapons, War, and Terrorism

Regular price €79.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Ian E. J. Hill
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Amos A. Fries
Atomic bombs
August Spies
Author_Ian E. J. Hill
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=CFG
Category=GTC
Category=JPWL
Category=TBX
Category=TTMW
Chemical weapons
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Dynamite
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Haymarket
Improvised explosive devices/IEDs
Improvised explosive devicesIEDs
Language_English
Leo Szilard
Manhattan Project
Mustard gas
Nuclear weapons
PA=Available
Paradox
Population bomb
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
Rhetorical criticism
Science and technology studies
softlaunch
Technology studies
Ted Kaczynski
Terrorism
Thomas Malthus
Unabomber
Violence
War
Weapons
Weapons rhetoric

Product details

  • ISBN 9780271081236
  • Weight: 476g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Aug 2018
  • Publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Technē’s Paradox—a frequent theme in science fiction—is the commonplace belief that technology has both the potential to annihilate humanity and to preserve it. Advocating Weapons, War, and Terrorism looks at how this paradox applies to some of the most dangerous of technologies: population bombs, dynamite bombs, chemical weapons, nuclear weapons, and improvised explosive devices.

Hill’s study analyzes the rhetoric used to promote such weapons in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. By examining Thomas R. Malthus’s Essay on the Principle of Population, the courtroom address of accused Haymarket bomber August Spies, the army textbook Chemical Warfare by Major General Amos A. Fries and Clarence J. West, the life and letters of Manhattan Project physicist Leo Szilard, and the writings of Ted “Unabomber” Kaczynski, Hill shows how contemporary societies are equipped with abundant rhetorical means to describe and debate the extreme capacities of weapons to both destroy and protect. The book takes a middle-way approach between language and materialism that combines traditional rhetorical criticism of texts with analyses of the persuasive force of weapons themselves, as objects, irrespective of human intervention.

Advocating Weapons, War, and Terrorism is the first study of its kind, revealing how the combination of weapons and rhetoric facilitated the magnitude of killing in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and illuminating how humanity understands and acts upon its propensity for violence. This book will be invaluable for scholars of rhetoric, scholars of science and technology, and the study of warfare.

Ian E. J. Hill is Assistant Professor in the History and Theory of Rhetoric at the University of British Columbia and an affiliate faculty member of the Graduate Program in Science and Technology Studies.

More from this author