Against Better Judgment

Regular price €38.99
Title
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Thomas Salem Manganaro
agency
akrasia
antinomy
Aristotle
Author_Thomas Salem Manganaro
Category=DSBF
Category=QRAB
Daniel Defoe
David Hume
eighteenth-century literature
empiricism
English novels
English poetry
Enlightenment philosophy
enumeration
Epicurean
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Euripides
free indirect discourse
hysteria
idleness
ignorance
inaction
Jane Austen
John Keats
lazy
literary innovation
literature and philosophy
Medea
memory
motivation
Ovid
Romanticism
Samuel Johnson
silence
sin
sloth
theater
Thomas Hobbes
weakness of will
William Shakespeare
Winner of the Walker Cowen Memorial Prize

Product details

  • ISBN 9780813947303
  • Weight: 363g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 228mm
  • Publication Date: 30 May 2022
  • Publisher: University of Virginia Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Robinson Crusoe recognizes it is foolish to leave for the open seas; nevertheless, he boards the ship. William Wordsworth of The Prelude sees the immense poetic task ahead of him, but instead of beginning work, he procrastinates by going for a walk. Centering on this sort of intentionally irrational action, originally defined as " akrasia" by the ancient Greeks and "weakness of will" in early Christian thought, Against Better Judgment argues that the phenomenon takes on renewed importance in the long eighteenth century.

In treating human minds and bodies as systems and machines, Enlightenment philosophers did not account for actions that may be undermotivated, contradictory, or self-betraying. A number of authors, from Daniel Defoe and Samuel Johnson to Jane Austen and John Keats, however, took up the phenomenon in inventive ways. Thomas Manganaro traces how English novelists, essayists, and poets of the period sought to represent akrasia in ways philosophy cannot, leading them to develop techniques and ideas distinctive to literary writing, including new uses of irony, interpretation, and contradiction. In attempting to give shape to the ways people knowingly and freely fail themselves, these authors produced a new linguistic toolkit that distinguishes literature’s epistemological advantages when it comes to writing about people.

More from this author