Against Methodology in Science and Religion

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Josh Reeves
Alisdair McGrath
anti-essentialism
Anti-essentialist Critique
Author_Josh Reeves
Category=PDA
Category=QRAB
Category=QRAM3
Category=QRVG
compatibility of science and religion
Considering New Methodologies for Science and Religion
Critical Realism
Degenerating Problem Shift
Early Modern Natural Philosophers
Enlightenment Foundationalism
Epistemic Skill
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
Essentialism
Evolutionary Epistemology
Final Lesson
interdisciplinary methodology
Josh Reeves
Kuhn's Work
Kuhn’s Work
Lakatos's Criteria
Lakatos's Methodology
Lakatos's Work
Lakatosian
Lakatosian Methodology
Lakatosian Research Program
Lakatos’s Criteria
Lakatos’s Methodology
Lakatos’s Work
Methodological Proposals
Miracle Argument
Modern Intellectual Life
Nancey Murphy
philosophy of science
Positive Heuristic
Postfoundationalist
rationality
Religion
Religion Scholars
Religious Studies
research programme critique
Research Programs
Science
Science and Religion
scientific rationality
Scientific Theology
Theological Research Program
Theology
theology epistemology
Thomas Kuhn
Transversal Rationality
Van Huyssteen
Wentzel Van Huyssteen

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138477940
  • Weight: 358g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 19 Sep 2018
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Since its development as a field over the last part of the twentieth century, scholars in science and religion have been heavily concerned with methodological issues. Following the lead of Thomas Kuhn, many scholars in this interdisciplinary field have offered proposals that purport to show how theology and science are compatible by appropriating theories of scientific methodology or rationality. Arguing against this strategy, this book shows why much of this methodological work is at odds with recent developments in the history and philosophy of science and should be reconsidered.

Firstly, three influential methodological proposals are critiqued: Lakatosian research programs, Alister McGrath’s "Scientific Theology" and the Postfoundationalist project of Wentzel van Huyssteen. Each of these approaches is shown to have a common failing: the idea that science has an essential nature, with features that unite "scientific" or even "rational" inquiry across time or disciplines. After outlining the issues this failing could have on the viability of the field, the book concludes by arguing that there are several ways scholarship in science and religion can move forward, even if the terms "science" and "religion" do not refer to something universally valid or philosophically useful.

This is a bold study of the methodology of science and religion that pushes both subjects to consider the other more carefully. As such, it will be of great interest to scholars in religious studies, theology and the philosophy of science.

Josh Reeves is Assistant Professor of Science and Religion at Samford University, USA. Having run the New Directions in Science and Religion project, he has also written multiple articles on science and religion for peer-reviewed journals and is a co-author of A Little Book for New Scientists (2016).

More from this author