Analysis of David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

Regular price €25.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Ian Jackson
A01=John Donaldson
Agnostics
alvin
Alvin Plantinga
Ancient Greece
argument
argument analysis
Author_Ian Jackson
Author_John Donaldson
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Category=DSA
Category=JM
Category=JNZ
Category=JPA
Category=QD
Category=QRA
Cleanthes
Contingent Entity
Corner
cosmological
critical reasoning skills
design
dialogues
Drew Back
eighteenth-century philosophy
Empiricist World View
Emptiness Problem
Enlightenment
epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Follow
from
Glasgow Universities
God's Existence
God’s Existence
Held
Hume's Empiricist
Hume’s Empiricist
Ian Jackson
Lived
Logical Empiricists
Main
Main Characters
Natural Religion
Natural Theology
philosophical dialogue analysis
Philosophical Masterpiece
philosophy of religion
plantinga
reformed
scepticism
Strong
theologian
theological debate
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912303007
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion is a philosophical classic that displays a powerful mastery of the critical thinking skills of reasoning and evaluation. Hume’s subject, the question of the existence and possible nature of God, was, and still is, a persistent topic of philosophical and theological debate. What makes Hume’s text a classic of reasoning, though, is less what he says, than how he says it. As he noted in his preface to the book, the question of ‘natural religion’ was unanswerable: so ‘obscure and uncertain’ that ‘human reason can reach no fixed determination with regard to it.’

Hume chose, as a result, to cast his thoughts on the topic in the form of a dialogue – allowing different points of view to be reasoned out, evaluated and answered by different characters. Considering and judging different or opposing points of view, as Hume’s characters do, is an important part of reasoning, and is vital to building strong persuasive arguments. Even if, as Hume suggests, there can be no final answer to what a god might be like, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion shows high-level reasoning and evaluation at their best.

Dr John Donaldson holds a Phd in philosophy from the University of Glasgow, where he now teaches. His work focuses on philosophy of mind, particularly the metaphysics of mind: the problem of mental causation, the mind-body problem, and the prospects for materialist accounts of mental phenomena.

Ian Jackson is a PhD student in the Politics, Philosophy and Religion department at Lancaster University. He is interested in the role new media plays in the dissemination of ideas.

More from this author