Analysis of Douglas McGregor's The Human Side of Enterprise

Regular price €25.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Monique Diderich
A01=Stoyan Stoyanov
Author_Monique Diderich
Author_Stoyan Stoyanov
Category=KJB
Category=KJC
cost
Cost Reduction Sharing
critical evaluation of management approaches
Diderich Monique
Died
douglas
employee engagement
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Fail
Feedback
Fully
Hold
Human Side
leadership models
Live
Main
management philosophy
mcgregor
McGregor's Ideas
McGregor's Theory
McGregor's Work
mcgregors
McGregor’s Ideas
McGregor’s Theory
McGregor’s Work
MIT
Modern
motivation theories
organisational behaviour
plan
Poor
Pride
Reduce
reduction
Rewarded
scanlon
Scanlon Plan
Scientific Management
Sealants Company
sharing
sloan
Sloan Foundation
Social Science Research
Sort
Stoyanov Stoyan
Struggle
work
workplace psychology

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912302178
  • Weight: 330g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

What makes a good manager? Though we can probably all point to someone we think of as a good manager, what precisely makes them so good at their job is a complex question – and one central to good business organization. Management scholar Douglas McGregor’s seminal 1960 book The Human Side of Enterprise is perhaps the most influential attempt to answer that question, and provides an excellent example of strong evaluative and reasoning skills in action.

Evaluation is all about judging the strength and weakness of positions: a critical evaluation asks how acceptable a line of reasoning is, how adequate, relevant and convincing the evidence is. McGregor sought to find out what makes a good manager by evaluating different management approaches, their assumptions about human behavior, and effects they had. In his view, management approaches could be roughly broken down into two “theories”: Theory X, which held a negative idea of employee motivations; and Theory Y, which made positive assumptions about them. In McGregor’s evaluation, Theory Y produced markedly better results in productivity and other measurable areas. On this basis, McGregor reasoned out a strong, persuasive argument for adopting Theory Y strategies on a grand scale.

Dr Stoyan Stoyanov holds a PhD in management from the University of Edinburgh. He is currently a lecturer at the Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

Monique Diderich is a consultant at the National Foreign Language Center at the University of Maryland.

More from this author