Analysis of Eugene Genovese's Roll, Jordan, Roll

Regular price €25.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Cheryl Hudson
A01=Eva Namusoke
America
american
American Negro Slavery
American Slavery
American South social structure
Author_Cheryl Hudson
Author_Eva Namusoke
Bancroft Prize
Category=JNZ
Category=NH
Category=QD
Communist Party USA
cultural resistance slavery
Embraced
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
eugene
Eugene Genovese
Eva Namusoke Cheryl Hudson
genovese
Genovese's Roll
Genovese's Work
genoveses
Genovese’s Roll
Genovese’s Work
Gramscian hegemony
Hold
kolchin
Lived
master slave relations analysis
Master Slave Relationship
negro
North
peter
plantation society
Planter Class
Planter Paternalism
power dynamics history
Red And Black
Roll Jordan Roll
slave agency
Slave Culture
Slave's Perspective
slavery
Slavery Studies
Slaves Made
Slave’s Perspective
Southern
Strong
USA
Vietnam
work

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912302581
  • Weight: 350g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Most studies of slavery are underpinned by ideology and idealism. Eugene Genovese's ground-breaking book takes a stand against both these influences, arguing not only that all ideological history is bad history – a remarkable statement, coming from a self-professed Marxist – but also that slavery itself can only be understood if master and slave are studied together, rather than separately.

Genovese's most important insight, which makes this book a fine example of the critical thinking skill of problem-solving, is that the best way to view the institution of American slavery is to understand why exactly it was structured as it was. He saw slavery as a process of continual renegotiation of power balances, as masters strove to extract the maximum work from their slaves, while slaves aimed to obtain acknowledgement of their humanity and the ability to shape elements of the world that they were forced to live in.

Genovese's thesis is not wholly original; he adapts Gramsci's notion of hegemony to re-interpret the master-slave relationship – but it is an important example of the benefits of asking productive new questions about topics that seem, superficially at least, to be entirely obvious. By focusing on slave culture, rather than producing another study of economic determinism, this massive study succeeds in reconceptualising an institution in an exciting new way.

Dr Cheryl Hudson holds a PhD in History from Vanderbilt University, where her work examined the Political Culture of Chicago, 1890-1930. Currently a University Teacher in American history at the University of Liverpool, she has taught at universities in the UK and the USA, including Oxford, Sheffield, Coventry, Vanderbilt, Sussex and Kent, and is a former director of the academic programme at the Rothermere American Institute, University of Oxford.

Dr Eva Namusoke took her PhD in History from the University of Cambridge with work focusing on the History of the Church in Twentieth-Century Uganda. She is currently a research fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, at the School of Advanced Study, University of London.

More from this author