Analysis of Gordon W. Allport's The Nature of Prejudice

Regular price €25.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Alexander O'Connor
A01=Alexander O’Connor
allport
Allport's Contact Hypothesis
Allport's Work
Allport’s Work
american
American Civil Rights Movement
Author_Alexander O'Connor
Author_Alexander O’Connor
Benevolent Sexism
Category=JMR
civil
cognitive bias
Cognitive Revolution
discrimination research
Diversity Performance Evaluations
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Feedback
Follow
gordon
Gordon Allport
Held
Improve Intergroup Relations
Indiana
Intergroup Contact
Intergroup Contact Theory
intergroup relations
John Dovidio
Lawmakers
Living
Main
movement
personality
Personality Psychology
pettigrew
Prejudice Research
Prejudice Researchers
psychological mechanisms of prejudice
psychology
Reduce Intergroup Prejudice
rights
Social Cognition
social cognition theory
social psychology
stereotype formation
thomas
United States

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912303526
  • Weight: 330g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 25 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

With his 1954 book The Nature of Prejudice, American psychologist Gordon Allport displays the crucial skill of reasoning, producing and organizing an argument that was persuasive enough to have a major impact not only in universities, but also on government policy.

The question that Allport tackled was an old one: why are people so disposed to prejudice against those from other groups? Earlier psychologists had suggested a number of reasons, especially in the case of racial prejudice. Some had suggested that racism was a learned behaviour, conditioned by negative experiences of other races; others that there was an objective rationale to negative racial stereotypes.

Allport, however, reasoned that prejudice is essentially a by-product of the necessary mental shortcuts the human brain uses to process the vast amount of information it takes in. Because our brains want to use as little effort as possible, they regularly fall back on simple stereotypes – which easily generate prejudice. Gathering strong evidence for this hypothesis, he reasoned, clearly and persuasively, that our natural cognitive approach is the most significant factor in accounting for prejudice. Going further still, Allport also reasoned that, once this was better understood, social scientists would be able to influence policy-makers to curb discrimination by law.

Dr Alexander O’Connor did his postgraduate work at the University of California, Berkeley, where he received a PhD for work on Social and Personality Psychology.

More from this author