Analysis of Mary Douglas's Purity and Danger

Regular price €11.99
Quantity:
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Padraig Belton
Absolute Dirt
Anne's College
Anne’s College
anthropological perspectives on taboo
Author_Padraig Belton
Bodily Margins
Category=DSA
Category=JPA
Category=QD
classificatory
Classificatory Anomaly
comparative religion studies
Conduct Field Research
cultural classification systems
dance
dietary
Dirt Management
Douglas's Argument
Douglas's Book
Douglas's Theory
Douglas's Work
douglass
Douglas’s Argument
Douglas’s Book
Douglas’s Theory
Douglas’s Work
Durkheim's Insight
Durkheim’s Insight
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ethnographic analysis
Friday Abstinence
Genesis Creation Narrative
Golden Bough
Harmonious Societies
Indigenous African Religions
jewish
Jewish Dietary Laws
kosher
Kosher Dietary Laws
law
laws
Man's Destiny
Man’s Destiny
Moses Maimonides
Padded Feet
Paig Belton
Primitive Magic
rain
Rain Dance
Rain Rituals
religious symbolism
ritual purity theory
symbolic anthropology
Testament Scholarship
work

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912284634
  • Weight: 140g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Feb 2018
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Mary Douglas is an outstanding example of an evaluative thinker at work. In Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, she delves in great detail into existing arguments that portray traditional societies as “evolving” from “savage” beliefs in magic, to religion, to modern science, then explains why she believes those arguments are wrong. She also adeptly chaperones readers through a vast amount of data, from firsthand research in the Congo to close readings of the Old Testament, and analyzes it in depth to provide evidence that traditional and Western religions have more in common than the first comparative religion scholars and early anthropologists thought.

First evaluating her scholarly predecessors by marshalling their arguments, Douglas identifies their main weakness: that they dismiss traditional societies and their religions by identifying their practices as “magic,” thereby creating a chasm between savages who believe in magic and sophisticates who practice religion.

Pádraig Belton undertook his doctoral research in politics and international relations at the University of Oxford. A prolific financia, business and political journalist, his work has appeared in publications including the Irish Times, the Guardian, Telegraph, Independent, the Irish Independent, the Atlantic, the New Statesman, Prospect, the Times Literary Supplement, and Foreign Policy.

More from this author