Analysis of Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

Regular price €25.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Ruth Scobie
aims
America
Author_Ruth Scobie
Butler
Category=DSB
Category=JBSF11
controversy
eighteenth-century gender studies
Enlightenment
Enlightenment political thought
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
feminist philosophy
Follow
gender equality scholarship
Grand Source
historical feminist critique of education
Hold
ideas
Independent
Independent Woman
Ladies
Live
Main
Mankind
mary
Mary Astell
Mary Wollstonecraft
Moral Reason
Nicolas De Condorcet
paine
revolution
Single Sex Boarding Schools
social contract theory
Stronger
thomas
Wollstonecraft
Wollstonecraft's Aim
Wollstonecraft's Argument
Wollstonecraft's Ideas
Wollstonecraft's Rights
Wollstonecraft's Thought
Wollstonecraft's Works
wollstonecrafts
Wollstonecraft’s Aim
Wollstonecraft’s Argument
Wollstonecraft’s Ideas
Wollstonecraft’s Rights
Wollstonecraft’s Works
women's education history
works

Product details

  • ISBN 9781912302901
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 129 x 198mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Jul 2017
  • Publisher: Macat International Limited
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Mary Wollstonecraft’s 1792 Vindication of the Rights of Women is an incendiary attack on the place of women in 18th-century society.

Often considered to be the earliest widely-circulated work of feminism, the book is a powerful example of what can be achieved by creative thinkers – people who refuse to be bound by the standard ways of thinking, or to see things through the same lenses that everyone else uses. In the case of the Vindication, Wollstonecraft’s independent thinking went directly against the standard assumptions of the age regarding women.

During the seventeenth century and earlier, it was an entirely standard point of view to consider women as, largely speaking, uneducable. They were widely considered to be men’s inferiors, incapable of rational thought. They not only did not need a rational education – it was assumed that they could not benefit from one. Wollstonecraft, in contrast, argued that women’s apparent triviality was a direct consequence of society failing to educate them. If they were not men’s equals, it was the fault of a society that refused to treat them as such. So radical was her message that it would take until the 20th century for her views to become truly accepted.

Dr Ruth Scobie holds a PhD in English literature from the University of York. She is currently an Early Career Research Fellow at TORCH at the University of Oxford, where she specialises in the eighteenth century and the development of celebrity.

More from this author