Anglo-Irish Relations

Regular price €50.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nick Pelling
Anglo-Irish Relations
Anglo-Irish Treaty
Anglo-Irish War
Author_Nick Pelling
Bonar Law
British imperialism
Category=JPS
Category=NHD
constitutional reform Ireland
easter
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Free State
Gaelic League
Gaelic Revival
Great Agricultural Depression
Great Famine
historiographical debate
Home Rule
Home Rule Bill
Home Rule Legislation
IPP
ireland
Irish Church Temporalities Act
Irish independence struggle
Irish National Land League
Irish Parliament
Irish political history
King George III
Land League
Lichfield House Compact
movements
nationalist movements
parliament
parliamentary
party
rising
Sir Roger Casement
tone
unionist ideology
United Irishmen
William III
wolfe
young
Young Ireland
Young Ireland Movement
Younger Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415240390
  • Weight: 192g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 12 Dec 2002
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Providing essays, sources with questions and worked answers, together with background to each topic within Irish history, Nick Pelling provides a good foundational text for the study of Anglo-Irish relations.

For centuries the relationship between Ireland and England has been difficult. Anglo-Irish Relations, 1798–1922 explores the tempestuous events from Wolfe Tone's failed rising to Michael Collins's arguably more successful effort, culminating in the controversial Anglo-Irish treaty of 1921.

Classic struggles between key figures, such as O'Connell and Peel, Parnell and Gladstone, and Lloyd George and Michael Collins, are discussed and analyzed. The deeper issues about the nature of British Imperial rule and the diversity of Irish nationalism are also examined, highlighting the historiographical debate surrounding the so-called 'revisionist' view.

More from this author