Apocalypse of John Among its Critics – Questions and Controversies
Regular price
€38.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Alan S. Bandy
A01=Alexander E. Stewart
A01=Gregory K. Beale
Author_Alan S. Bandy
Author_Alexander E. Stewart
Author_Gregory K. Beale
book of revelation
Category=QRM
Category=QRMF13
Category=QRVC
Category=QRVG
christian antisemitism
christian apologetics
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
god behaving badly
is revelation antisemitic
is revelation racist
is revelation sexist
should revelation be in the canon
Product details
- ISBN 9781683597063
- Dimensions: 6 x 9mm
- Publication Date: 26 Jul 2023
- Publisher: Faithlife Corporation
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Should Christians be embarrassed by the book of Revelation?
The Revelation of John has long confused and disturbed readers. The Apocalypse of John among Its Critics confronts the book's difficulties. Leading experts in Revelation wrestle honestly with a question raised by critics:
● Should John's Apocalypse be in the canon? (Alan S. Bandy)
● Was John intentionally confusing? (Ian Paul)
● Was John a bully? (Alexander E. Stewart)
● Did John delight in violence? (Dana M. Harris)
● Was John a chauvinist? (Külli Tõniste)
● Was John intolerant to others? (Michael Naylor)
● Was John antisemitic? (Rob Dalrymple)
● Did John make things up about the future? (Dave Mathewson)
● Did John advocate political subversion? (Mark Wilson)
● Did John misuse the Old Testament? (G.K. Beale)
Engaging deeply with Revelation's difficulties helps the reader understand the book's message--and respond rightly. The book of Revelation does not need to be avoided or suppressed. It contains words of life.
The Revelation of John has long confused and disturbed readers. The Apocalypse of John among Its Critics confronts the book's difficulties. Leading experts in Revelation wrestle honestly with a question raised by critics:
● Should John's Apocalypse be in the canon? (Alan S. Bandy)
● Was John intentionally confusing? (Ian Paul)
● Was John a bully? (Alexander E. Stewart)
● Did John delight in violence? (Dana M. Harris)
● Was John a chauvinist? (Külli Tõniste)
● Was John intolerant to others? (Michael Naylor)
● Was John antisemitic? (Rob Dalrymple)
● Did John make things up about the future? (Dave Mathewson)
● Did John advocate political subversion? (Mark Wilson)
● Did John misuse the Old Testament? (G.K. Beale)
Engaging deeply with Revelation's difficulties helps the reader understand the book's message--and respond rightly. The book of Revelation does not need to be avoided or suppressed. It contains words of life.
Alexander E. Stewart is vice president for academic services and professor of New Testament at Gateway Seminary in Ontario, California.
Alan S. Bandy is Robert L. Hamblin Chair of New Testament Exposition and associate dean of research doctoral programs at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisiana.
Alan S. Bandy is Robert L. Hamblin Chair of New Testament Exposition and associate dean of research doctoral programs at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisiana.
