Home » Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies
Product Image

Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies

Frans H. van Eemeren | Rob Grootendorst
€192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Frans H. van Eemeren
A01=Rob Grootendorst
advanced argumentation methods
argument analysis
Argumentation Scheme
Argumentation Stage
argumentative
Argumentative Discourse
argumentum
Argumentum Ad
Argumentum Ad Baculum
Argumentum Ad Consequentiam
Argumentum Ad Hominem
Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam
Argumentum Ad Misericordiam
Argumentum Ad Verecundiam
Author_Frans H. van Eemeren
Author_Rob Grootendorst
Category=CFD
Category=GTC
Category=JBCT
Category=JMA
Category=JMR
Category=NH
Complex Speech Act
critical discussion
dialectical
discourse
discourse evaluation
Elementary Speech Acts
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
fallacy identification
Indirect Speech Acts
informal logic
Logical Argument Form
Logical Minimum
Mixed Dispute
Negative Standpoint
perspective
pragma
Pragma Dialectical
Pragma Dialectical Approach
Pragma Dialectical Perspective
Pragma Dialectical Theory
Pragmatic Optimum
premises
speech act theory
stage
Structure Dependent Properties
unexpressed
Unexpressed Premise
verecundiam
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138144552
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Jul 2016
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Description

This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse. After placing argumentation in a communicative perspective, and then discussing the fallacies that occur when certain rules of communication are violated, the authors offer an alternative to both the linguistically-inspired descriptive and logically-inspired normative approaches to argumentation.

The authors characterize argumentation as a complex speech act in a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. The various stages of a critical discussion are outlined, and the communicative and interactional aspects of the speech acts performed in resolving a simple or complex dispute are discussed. After dealing with crucial aspects of analysis and linking the evaluation of argumentative discourse to the analysis, the authors identify the fallacies that can occur at various stages of discussion. Their general aim is to elucidate their own pragma- dialectical perspective on the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse, bringing together pragmatic insight concerning speech acts and dialectical insight concerning critical discussion.
About Frans H. van Eemeren | Rob Grootendorst
Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

More from this author