Aristotle and Plotinus on the Intellect

Regular price €122.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Mark J. Nyvlt
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
ancient philosophy
Author_Mark J. Nyvlt
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPJ
Category=HPK
Category=HPM
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTM
Classical philosophy
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Language_English
metaphysics
PA=Available
philosophy of mind
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9780739167755
  • Weight: 576g
  • Dimensions: 164 x 239mm
  • Publication Date: 17 Nov 2011
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
This book emphasizes that Aristotle was aware of the philosophical attempt to subordinate divine Intellect to a prior and absolute principle. Nyvlt argues that Aristotle transforms the Platonic doctrine of Ideal Numbers into an astronomical account of the unmoved movers, which function as the multiple intelligible content of divine Intellect. Thus, within Aristotle we have in germ the Plotinian doctrine that the intelligibles are within the Intellect. While the content of divine Intellect is multiple, it does not imply that divine Intellect possesses a degree of potentiality, given that potentiality entails otherness and contraries. Rather, the very content of divine Intellect is itself; it is Thought Thinking Itself. The pure activity of divine Intellect, moreover, allows for divine Intellect to know the world, and the acquisition of this knowledge does not infect divine Intellect with potentiality. The status of the intelligible object(s) within divine Intellect is pure activity that is identical with divine Intellect itself, as T. De Koninck and H. Seidl have argued. Therefore, the intelligible objects within divine Intellect are not separate entities that determine divine Intellect, as is the case in Plotinus.
Mark J. Nyvlt is an assistant professor at the Dominican University College, Ottawa.

More from this author