Aristotle's Induction and the Inference of First Principles

Regular price €104.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=David Botting
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
ancient philosophy
Author_David Botting
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPCA
Category=HPJ
Category=HPK
Category=QDHA
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTK
classics
COP=United States
Delivery_Pre-order
Empiricism
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Foundationalism
Individual philosophers
Intuition
Knowledge of essences
Language_English
Natural necessity
PA=Not yet available
Philosophy of science
Posterior Analytics
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Forthcoming
Scientific knowledge
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666950212
  • Weight: 558g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 27 Nov 2024
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Aristotle's Induction and the Inference of First Principles observes that Aristotle’s reputation as an empiricist has come under threat. In the Posterior Analytics, Aristotle puts forward a foundationalist theory of scientific knowledge that problematizes knowing the science's first principles empirically. Aristotle states that we know the principles through induction but also that induction is inadequate for knowing essences. In response to this tension, rationalists claim that Aristotle equivocates between two conceptions of induction, enumerative and intuitive:"intuitive induction" being that which grasps the principles and provides direct knowledge of essences, “enumerative induction” being that which is said to be inadequate. Empiricists preserve an empiricist road to first principles by downplaying enumerative induction’s role.

In order to preserve Aristotle's avowals that it is by induction that we know the principles while avoiding the rationalist alternative, David Botting provides an inferentialist account of induction, showing how the content of a first principle is inferentially known but not its necessity, which must be proved by constructing the first principle from simpler elements. A world governed by natural necessities and not just brute regularities is knowable through the senses and without resorting to super-empirical acts or faculties of intuition.

David Botting, PhD, is an independent scholar.

More from this author