Regular price €29.99
A01=Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment
A01=Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects
A01=Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
A01=National Research Council
Author_Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment
Author_Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects
Author_Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
Author_National Research Council
Category=PH
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science

Product details

  • ISBN 9780309106399
  • Dimensions: 216 x 279mm
  • Publication Date: 10 May 2007
  • Publisher: National Academies Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

Peer review is an essential component of engineering practice and other scientific and technical undertakings. Peer reviews are conducted to ensure that activities are technically adequate, competently performed, and properly documented; to validate assumptions, calculations, and extrapolations; and to assess alternative interpretations, methodologies, acceptance criteria, and other aspects of the work products and the documentation that support them. Effective peer reviews are conducted in an environment of mutual respect, recognizing the contributions of all participants. Their primary objective is to help the project team achieve its goals. Reviews also contribute to quality assurance, risk management, and overall improvement of the management process.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) conducts different types of peer reviews at the different stages of a project, including reviews to assess risks and other factors related to design, safety, cost estimates, value engineering, and project management. Independent project reviews (IPRs) are conducted by federal staff not directly affiliated with the project or program and management and operations (M&O) contractors. External independent reviews (EIRs) are overseen by the Office of Engineering and Construction Management and conducted by contractors external to the department. EIRs are the primary focus of this report. However, the committee found that, in many cases, IPRs are explicitly used as preparation for or as preliminary reviews prior to EIRs. Thus, because IPRs are integral to the review process in DOE, they are also discussed because they might have an effect on EIRs.

In October 2000, DOE issued Order 413.3, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets (DOE, 2000). The order established a series of five critical decisions (CDs), or major milestones, that require senior management review and approval to ensure that a project satisfies applicable mission, design, security, and safety requirements: approve mission need, approve alternative selection and cost range, approve performance baseline, approve start of construction, and approve start of operations or project closeout.

Assessment of the Results of External Independent Reviews for U. S. Department of Energy Projects summarizes the results.

Table of Contents
  • Front Matter
  • Summary
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Characteristics of Effective External Independent Reviews
  • 3 Criteria for Structuring Review Programs
  • 4 Conclusions, Findings, and Recommendations
  • A Biographies of Committee Members and Consultant
  • B EIR Documents Reviewed by the Committee
  • C Summary Notes of a Workshop on DOE EIRs
  • D Acronyms and Abbreviations
Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects, National Research Council