Atlantic Divide in Antitrust

Regular price €68.99
Title
A01=Daniel J. Gifford
A01=Robert T. Kudrle
antitrust decisions
Author_Daniel J. Gifford
Author_Robert T. Kudrle
big business
Category=LNCH
commerce
comparative law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eu competition policy
european union
finance
free markets
intellectual property
judicial review
language
legal precedent
marketplace
mergers
military
money
monopolization
political institutions
power
predatory pricing
price discrimination
purchasers
single-product loyalty
social values
supply contracts
trade
united states
wealth
welfare

Product details

  • ISBN 9780226176109
  • Weight: 567g
  • Dimensions: 17 x 24mm
  • Publication Date: 11 Feb 2015
  • Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

How is it that two broadly similar systems of competition law have reached different results across a number of significant antitrust issues? While the United States and the European Union share a commitment to maintaining competition in the marketplace and employ similar concepts and legal language in making antitrust decisions, differences in social values, political institutions, and legal precedent have inhibited close convergence. With The Atlantic Divide in Antitrust, Daniel J. Gifford and Robert T. Kudrle explore many of the main contested areas of contemporary antitrust, including mergers, price discrimination, predatory pricing, and intellectual property. After identifying how prevailing analyses differ across these areas, they then examine the policy ramifications. Several themes run throughout the book, including differences in the amount of discretion firms have in dealing with purchasers, the weight given to the welfare of various market participants, and whether competition tends to be viewed as an efficiency-generating process or as rivalry. The authors conclude with forecasts and suggestions for how greater compatibility might ultimately be attained.
Daniel J. Gifford is the Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School. Robert T. Kudrle is the Orville and Jane Freeman Professor of International Trade and Investment Policy at the Hubert Humphrey School of Public Affairs and the Law School at the University of Minnesota. Both have written extensively on antitrust issues.