Atoms, Bytes and Genes

Regular price €67.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Martin W. Bauer
Author_Martin W. Bauer
biology
Biotechnology Movement
brain
Category=JBF
Category=JBFV5
Category=JH
Category=JHB
Category=JHBA
diff
ect
eff
Embryonic Stem Cell Research
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
erent
Gdp Investment
Gm Crop
Gm Food
Gm Food Debate
Gm Soya
HBP.
Hoff Mann
human
Human Brain Project
Mind Sets
Mobilisation Effort
Mode Ii
Nuclear Power
Nuclear Project
Pain Analogy
power
project
Public Engagement
Recombinant DNA
Stem Cell Research
synthetic
Synthetic Biology
Te Ch
Techno Scientific Project
UK Press
UK Press Coverage
Xerox PARC

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415793537
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Dec 2016
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

"Atom," "byte" and "gene" are metonymies for techno-scientific developments of the 20th century: nuclear power, computing and genetic engineering. Resistance continues to challenge these developments in public opinion. This book traces historical debates over atoms, bytes and genes which raised controversy with consequences, and argues that public opinion is a factor of the development of modern techno-science. The level and scope of public controversy is an index of resistance, examined here with a "pain analogy" which shows that just as pain impacts movement, resistance impacts techno-scientific mobilization: it signals that something is wrong, and this requires attention, elaboration and a response to the challenge. This analysis shows how different fields of enquiry deal with the resistance of social-psychological mentalities in the face of industrial, scientific and political activities inspired by projected futures.

Martin W. Bauer is Professor of Social Psychology at London School of Economics and Political Sciences and the Editor of Public Understanding of Science.

More from this author