Authorship of the Pseudo-Dionysian Corpus

Regular price €31.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Vladimir Kharlamov
Ancient Greece
Apophatic Anthropology
Apostolic Fathers
Apostolic Period
Assumed Names
Athenian neoplatonism
Author_Vladimir Kharlamov
Byzantine theology
Category=NHC
Category=QDHA
Category=QRM
Christian identity formation
Christian Initiation
Christianity of Pseudo-Dionysius
Defensive Strategy
Dionysian Corpus
Dionysian scholarship
Earthly Ministry
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Hans Urs Von Balthasar
historical context analysis
John Philoponus
John Scottus Eriugena
Late Antique Approaches
Late Antiquity Christian
Late Neoplatonism
Literary Ploy
Mysterious Author
origins of Christian philosophical synthesis
Paul Rorem
Platonic tradition
Proclus's Commentary
Proclus’s Commentary
pseudepigraphy studies
Pseudo-Dionysian Corpus
pseudonymous attribution
symbolic attribution
Terminus Ante Quem
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032176666
  • Weight: 300g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Sep 2021
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This monograph revisits one of the most debated aspects of Dionysian scholarship: the enigma of its authorship. To establish the identity of the author remains impossible. However, the legitimacy of the attribution of the corpus to Dionysius the Areopagite should not be seen as an intended forgery but rather as a masterfully managed literary device, which better indicates the initial intention of the actual author. The affiliation with Dionysius the Areopagite has metaphorical and literary significance. Dionysius is the only character in the New Testament who is unique in his conjunction between the apostle Paul and the Platonic Athenian Academy. In this regard this attribution, to the mind of the actual author of the corpus, could be a symbolic gesture to demonstrate the essential truth of both traditions as derived essentially from the same divine source. The importance of this assumption taken in its historical context highlights the culmination of the formation of the civilized Roman-Byzantine Christian identity.

Vladimir Kharlamov gained his PhD in Theological and Religious Studies at Drew University, US. His research in Pseudo-Dionysius and deification is closely connected with issues of interrelationship and dialogue between the emerging Christian Roman-Byzantine identity and the society of Late Antiquity at large.

More from this author