Avicenna on the Necessity of the Actual

Regular price €92.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Celia Kathryn Hatherly
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
arabic philosophy
Author_Celia Kathryn Hatherly
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPCB
Category=HPJ
Category=HRAX
Category=HRH
Category=QDHF
Category=QDTJ
Category=QRAX
Category=QRP
circularity
COP=United States
cosmology
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eternity
God
islamic philosophy
islamic studies
Language_English
Latin philosophy
modal metaphysics
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666904482
  • Weight: 485g
  • Dimensions: 159 x 238mm
  • Publication Date: 23 Sep 2022
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
According to Avicenna, whatever exists, while it exists, exists of necessity. Not all beings, however, exist with the same kind of necessity. Instead, they exist either necessarily per se or necessarily per aliud. Avicenna on the Necessity of the Actual: His Interpretation of Four Aristotelian Arguments explains how Avicenna uses these modal claims to show that God is the efficient as well as the final cause of an eternally existing cosmos. In particular, Celia Kathryn Hatherly shows how Avicenna uses four Aristotelian arguments to prove this very un-Aristotelian conclusion. These arguments include Aristotle's argument for the finitude of efficient causes in Metaphysics 2; his proof for the prime mover in the Physics and Metaphysics 12; his argument against the Megarians in Metaphysics 9; and his argument for the mutual entailment between the necessary and the eternal in De Caelo 1.12. Moreover, Hatherly contends, when Avicenna's versions of these arguments are correctly interpreted using his distinctive understanding of necessity and possibility, the objections raised against them by his contemporaries and modern scholars fail.
Celia Kathryn Hatherly is assistant professor of philosophy in the Humanities Department at MacEwan University.

More from this author