Behaviorist Looks at Form Recognition

Regular price €36.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=William R. Uttal
Author_William R. Uttal
Boltzmann Machine
Category=JMA
Category=JMAL
Category=JMR
Deve Lopment
Development
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Exper Imenta
Face Perception
Face Recognition
Face Space
Form Recognition
Form Recognition Process
Free Lunch Theorem
ies
Imposs Ib Le
Impossible
models
net
neural
Neural Net
Neural Net Models
Neural Net Theories
propert
Propert Ies
Psychological Science
psychologis
Psychoneural Equivalence
representat
Representat Ion
Sect Ion
Simulated Annealing
spat
Spat Ia
Spatial Frequency
specif
stimulus
Stimulus Form
Subjective Contours

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415645522
  • Weight: 408g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 09 Jul 2013
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

For many years behaviorism was criticized because it rejected the study of perception. This rejection was based on the extreme view that percepts were internal subjective experiences and thus not subject to examination. This book argues that this logic is incorrect and shows how visual perception, particularized in the study of form recognition, can be carried out from the behavioral point of view if certain constraints and limitations are understood and accepted. The book discusses the idea of representation of forms, considers the major historical neural, psychological, and computational theories of form recognition, and then concludes by presenting a modern approach to the problem.

In this book, William Uttal continues his critical analysis of the foundations of modern psychology. He is particularly concerned with the logical and conceptual foundations of visual perception and uses form recognition as a vehicle to rationalize the discrepancies between classic behaviorism and what we now appreciate are legitimate research areas.

More from this author