Believing Against the Evidence

Regular price €198.40
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Anorexia Nervosa
Author_Miriam Schleifer McCormick
believe
Category=NH
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTM
Category=QDTQ
Deliberative Constraint
Deontological Judgments
Distinctive Human Function
Doxastic Practices
Doxastic Responsibility
Doxastic Voluntarism
epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
ethics
evaluate
Evaluative Judgments
evedentialism
Evidential Considerations
Evidential Norms
Fl Ourishing Life
form
Gangrenous Appendix
Great Pumpkin
Guidance Control
Higher Order Judgments
non-evidential
Non-evidential Reasons
philosophy
Properly Basic
Rational Noetic Structure
Reasoning Practice
Reasons Responsive Mechanism
Refl Ective Distance
Reformed Epistemologists
truth
Vice Versa
Violate
Voluntary Control

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415818841
  • Weight: 362g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 17 Nov 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The question of whether it is ever permissible to believe on insufficient evidence has once again become a live question. Greater attention is now being paid to practical dimensions of belief, namely issues related to epistemic virtue, doxastic responsibility, and voluntarism.

In this book, McCormick argues that the standards used to evaluate beliefs are not isolated from other evaluative domains. The ultimate criteria for assessing beliefs are the same as those for assessing action because beliefs and actions are both products of agency. Two important implications of this thesis, both of which deviate from the dominant view in contemporary philosophy, are 1) it can be permissible (and possible) to believe for non-evidential reasons, and 2) we have a robust control over many of our beliefs, a control sufficient to ground attributions of responsibility for belief.

Miriam Schleifer McCormick is Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Richmond, US.

More from this author