British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science, 1774–1801

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Peter J. Aschenbrenner
American Law Makers
Animated Performance
Arthur Onslow
Author_Peter J. Aschenbrenner
Bentham's Essay
Burke's Speech
Category=JPA
Category=NHD
Category=NHK
Category=QDTS
Civil Society
Clerk Assistant
Clerk's Table
comparative government
Constitution II
constitutional history
Continental Congress
Economical Reformation
eighteenth-century politics
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Jefferson's Manual
Jefferson's Reference
Jeffersonian governance
John Hatsell
Josef Redlich
legislative procedure
Long Term Government Bond Yields
Lord John Cavendish
Merit Outcome
Nemine Contradicente
origins of American parliamentary practice
Parliamentary Science
Pitt's Income Tax
political institutions
Republic's Capacity
Sinking Fund
Sir Heneage Finch
Standing Orders

Product details

  • ISBN 9781472472656
  • Weight: 462g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Sep 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Upon declaring independence from Britain in July 1776, the United States Congress urgently needed to establish its credentials as a legitimate government that could credibly challenge the claims of the British Crown. In large measure this legitimacy rested upon setting in place the procedural and legal structures upon which all claims of governmental authority rest. In this book, Aschenbrenner explores the ways in which the nascent United States rapidly built up a system of parliamentary procedure that borrowed heavily from the British government it sought to replace. In particular, he looks at how, over the course of twenty-five years, Thomas Jefferson drew upon the writings of the Chief Clerk of the British Parliament, John Hatsell, to frame and codify American parliamentary procedures. Published in 1801, Jefferson’s Manual of Parliamentary Practice for the Use of the Senate of the United States presents rules, instances, citations and commentary as modern readers would expect them to appear, quoting Hatsell and other British authorities numerous times. If the two nations suffered any unpleasant relations in the First War for American Independence - Aschenbrenner concludes - one would be hard pressed to detect it from Jefferson’s Manual. Indeed, direct comparison of the House of Commons and the Continental Congress shows remarkable similarities between the ambitions of the two institutions as they both struggled to adapt their political processes to meet the changing national and international circumstances of the late-eighteenth century.

Peter J. Aschenbrenner holds a research appointment at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana in the Department of History as an adjunct professor.

More from this author