British Pan-Arab Policy, 1915-1922

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Isaiah Friedman
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Anglo-French Declaration
Arab Bureau
Arab nationalism
Author_Isaiah Friedman
automatic-update
Balfour Declaration
British imperial policy
British Pan-Arab Policy
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBJD
Category=HBJF1
Category=HBWN
Category=NHD
Category=NHG
Category=NHWR5
COP=United States
De Bunsen Committee
Delivery_Pre-order
Egyptian Expeditionary Force
Emir Feisal
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Es Salt
Hedjaz Railway
Isaiah Friedman
Jewish National Home
Jewish National Home Policy
King Crane Commission
Kitchener's Idea
Kitchener’s Idea
Language_English
League of Nations mandates
McMahon Letter
Middle East history
Muslim World
Ottoman Empire collapse
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Palestine Arab Congress
Palestine Arab Delegation
Palestinian Nationalists
postwar Middle East political dynamics
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
Secretary Of State
softlaunch
State Secretary
Sykes Picot Agreement
Syrian Hinterland
United Syria
Vice Versa
Yasin Al Hashimi
Zionist-Arab relations

Product details

  • ISBN 9781412810746
  • Weight: 940g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Jan 2010
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In this myth-shattering study Isaiah Friedman provides a new perspective on events in the Middle East during World War I and its aftermath. He shows that British officials in Cairo mistakenly assumed that the Arabs would rebel against Turkey and welcome the British as deliverers. Sharif (later king) Hussein did rebel, but not for nationalistic motives as is generally presented in historiography. Early in the war he simultaneously negotiated with the British and the Turks but, after discovering that the Turks intended to assassinate him, finally sided with the British. There was no Arab Revolt in the Fertile Crescent. It was mainly the soldiers of Britain, the Commonwealth, and India that overthrew the Ottoman rule, not the Arabs.

Both T.E. Lawrence ("Lawrence of Arabia") and Sir Mark Sykes hoped to revive the Arab nation and build a new Middle East. They courted disappointment: the Arabs resented the encroachment of European Powers and longed for the return of the Turks. Emir Feisal too became an exponent of Pan-Arabism and a proponent of the "United Syria" scheme. It was supported by the British Military Administration who wished thereby to eliminate the French from Syria. British officers were antagonistic to Zionism as well and were responsible for the anti-Jewish riots in Jerusalem in April 1920.

During the twenties, unlike the Hussein family and their allies, the peasants (fellaheen), who constituted the majority of the Arab population in Palestine, were not inimical towards the Zionists. They maintained that "progress and prosperity lie in the path of brotherhood" between Arabs and Jews and regarded Jewish immigration and settlement to be beneficial to the country. Friedman argues that, if properly handled, the Arab-Zionist conflict was not inevitable. The responsibility lay in the hands of the British administration of Palestine.

More from this author