Can the EU Spend Better?

Regular price €32.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Renaud Thillaye
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Renaud Thillaye
automatic-update
Budget
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JPQB
Category=KCP
Category=KJMV1
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Economic Policy
Economy
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
European Union
Government
Institutions
Language_English
PA=Available
Political Economy
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Redistribution
softlaunch
Strategic
Wealth

Product details

  • ISBN 9781786602848
  • Weight: 177g
  • Dimensions: 139 x 217mm
  • Publication Date: 22 Dec 2016
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The main parameters of the EU budget are decided upon every seven years when the MFF (Multi-annual Financial Framework) is negotiated. Before the end of 2016, EU institutions will undertake a mid-term review of the EU’s 2014-2020. This comes in a context of severe turbulences for the EU project: a difficult economic and social situation in most member states, huge migration pressures and new security threats stemming from an unstable environment, and the Britain’s decision to leave the EU.

At the same time, EU countries need to face up to climate change and engineer a smooth transition towards an innovation-based sustainable economic model. The EU’s very survival depends on the ability to respond to these multiple challenges in the next few years. Making a smarter and more strategic use of the €960 billion MFF has become a necessity.

Can the EU Spend Better? argues that the scope for a substantial revision of the MFF is limited in the short-term. At most, pressing issues such as terrorism and the deteriorated social situation will lead to greater flexibility in the use of existing envelopes. However, the debate starting in 2017 over the next MFF provides with the opportunity of more substantial shifts in four main directions: more investment- and performance-oriented spending; the expansion of climate conditionality to all spending areas; more targeted redistributive spending matched with greater reform conditionality; a more outward-looking budget.

Renaud Thillaye is deputy director of Policy Network.

More from this author