Case for Contention

Regular price €92.99
A01=Emily Robertson
A01=Jonathan Zimmerman
academic
america
american
argument
Author_Emily Robertson
Author_Jonathan Zimmerman
Category=JNLB
classroom
climate change
contemporary
controversial
controversy
creationism
debate
development
education
educational
educator
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
evolution
historical
history
hot button
modern
pedagogy
philosophical
philosophy
policy
scholarly
sex ed
sexuality
student
teacher
teaching
united states
usa

Product details

  • ISBN 9780226456201
  • Weight: 312g
  • Dimensions: 16 x 24mm
  • Publication Date: 24 Apr 2017
  • Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

From the fights about the teaching of evolution to the details of sex education, it may seem like American schools are hotbeds of controversy. But as Jonathan Zimmerman and Emily Robertson show in this insightful book, it is precisely because such topics are so inflammatory outside school walls that they are so commonly avoided within them. And this, they argue, is a tremendous disservice to our students. Armed with a detailed history of the development of American educational policy and norms and a clear philosophical analysis of the value of contention in public discourse, they show that one of the best things American schools should do is face controversial topics dead on, right in their classrooms. Zimmerman and Robertson highlight an aspect of American politics that we know all too well: We are terrible at having informed, reasonable debates. We opt instead to hurl insults and accusations at one another or, worse, sit in silence and privately ridicule the other side. Wouldn't an educational system that focuses on how to have such debates in civil and mutually respectful ways improve our public culture and help us overcome the political impasses that plague us today? To realize such a system, the authors argue that we need to not only better prepare our educators for the teaching of hot-button issues, but also provide them the professional autonomy and legal protection to do so. And we need to know exactly what constitutes a controversy, which is itself a controversial issue. The existence of climate change, for instance, should not be subject to discussion in schools: scientists overwhelmingly agree that it exists. How we prioritize it against other needs, such as economic growth, however that is worth a debate. With clarity and common-sense wisdom, Zimmerman and Robertson show that our squeamishness over controversy in the classroom has left our students woefully underserved as future citizens. But they also show that we can fix it: if we all just agree to disagree, in an atmosphere of mutual respect.
Jonathan Zimmerman is professor of history of education in the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of six books, including, most recently, Campus Politics, and is a regular contributor to newspapers such as the New York Times and the Washington Post. Emily Robertson is associate professor emerita at Syracuse University. She is the author of 40 articles and book chapters and coauthor of Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research Association.