Changing U.S. Military Manpower Realities
Regular price
€192.20
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
Active Duty Members
Air Force Career
all-volunteer force analysis
all-volunteer force system
Category=JP
citizen-soldier concept
Dual Career Marriages
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
European NATO
European NATO Member
future of U.S. military manpower system
gender integration armed forces
High Career Satisfaction
Individual Ready Reserve
Interpersonal Satisfaction
IP
military family
military family dynamics
military recruitment challenges
NATO Commitment
NATO Leader
NATO Plan
Naval Health Research Center
Navy Wives
Navy Women
Occupational Orientations
recruitment problems
reserve component policy
Reserve Components
Selected Reserve
sociological perspectives defense
Strategic Air Transport
Total Force Concept
Total Force Policy
U.S. military
Vice Versa
West Germany
Women Pilots
Young Men
Product details
- ISBN 9780367022006
- Weight: 690g
- Dimensions: 146 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 07 Jun 2019
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Manpower—qualified, experienced, and in adequate supply—is considered by many to be the keystone of the U.S. capability to deter or wage war. But can the all-volunteer force (AVF) continue to attract and retain the quantity and quality of active and reserve forces required to meet the security needs of the nation? The contributors to this collection of original articles—representing the diverse views of civilian, government, and military scholars—analyze the political and sociological dimensions of the AVF and present recent research on major manpower issues, including recruitment problems, the military family, the role of women, racial problems, economic concerns, and the concept of the citizen-soldier. The authors also examine the demands and problems the AVF will face in the coming years. Contending that the AVF system is not working and will not work in its present form, they suggest —for debate, questioning, and reinterpretation—new directions for change.
