Chaos of Disciplines

Regular price €93.99
A01=Andrew Abbott
academia
analysis
anthropology
Author_Andrew Abbott
capitalism
Category=JHBA
Category=NHT
choice
conflict
consensus
constraint
constructionism
determinism
discourse
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
feminism
freedom
history
humanities
interdisciplinary
knowledge
literature
marxism
methodology
narrative
nonfiction
philosophy
scholarship
similarity
social sciences
sociology
solidarity

Product details

  • ISBN 9780226001005
  • Weight: 482g
  • Dimensions: 16 x 23mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Feb 2001
  • Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

In this new study, Andrew Abbott presents a fresh and daring analysis of the evolution and development of the social sciences. "Chaos of Disciplines" reconsiders how knowledge actually changes and advances. Challenging the accepted belief that social sciences are in a perpetual state of progress, Abbott contends that disciplines instead cycle around an inevitable pattern of core principles. New schools of thought, then, are less a reaction to an established order than they are a reinvention of fundamental concepts. "Chaos of Disciplines" uses fractals to explain the patterns of disciplines, and then applies them to key debates that surround the social sciences. Abbott argues that knowledge in different disciplines is organized by common oppositions that function at any level of theoretical or methodological scale. Opposing perspectives of thought and method, then, in fields ranging from history, sociology and literature, become radically similar, much like fractals, they are each mutual reflections of their own distinctions.