Regular price €26.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
A01=Committee on Assessing and Improving Strategies for Preventing
A01=Division on Earth and Life Studies
A01=National Academies of Sciences
and Medicine
and Responding to Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism: Chemical Threats
Author_Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
Author_Committee on Assessing and Improving Strategies for Preventing
Author_Division on Earth and Life Studies
Author_National Academies of Sciences
Category=JW
Category=JWK
Countering
Engineering
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain

Product details

  • ISBN 9780309706780
  • Dimensions: 178 x 254mm
  • Publication Date: 26 Nov 2024
  • Publisher: National Academies Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Domestic and foreign violent extremist organizations, or terrorist groups, have caused a greater amount of harm with chemical agents than with biological or radiological weapons. The United States capacity and capability to identify, prevent, counter, and respond adequately to chemical threats is established by the strategies, policies, and laws enacted across multiple levels of government. While the number of chemical terrorism incidents has risen and fallen over time, there is no empirical or analytical indication that the threat is disappearing. This report comes at a time when the nation's highest-level strategies have shifted from focusing primarily on violent extremist organizations to focusing more on Great Power Competition. This shift in relative perceived threat and consequent prioritization will impact efforts against chemical terrorism, and in turn, affect funding priorities. Revised risk assessments are needed to reprioritize risks guided by new strategies, so that strategy-aligned budgets can be created. The report recommends weapons of mass destruction budgets be aligned with evolving priorities and incentivize activities that transition promising research to operations.

More from this author