China’s Date Debate

Regular price €81.99
Quantity:
Will Deliver When Available
Will Deliver When Available
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
20th century China
Category=NHF
Category=NHWR7
Century of Humiliation
Chinese academics
Chinese Communist Party
Chinese historians
Communist Party of China
Dongbei
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
forthcoming
historical memory
Manchuria
Mao Zedong
Maoism
Marco Polo Bridge Incident
Marxism
modern Chinese history
Mukden Incident
nationalism
patriotic education
People's Republic of China
rejuvenation narrative
victim narrative
victor narrative
War of Resistance against Japan
World War II
WWII
Xi Jinping

Product details

  • ISBN 9780472078110
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 06 Aug 2026
  • Publisher: The University of Michigan Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

China’s Date Debate is an in-depth investigation of the Chinese Communist Party’s remapping of China’s World War II timeline from eight years (1937–1945) to fourteen years (1931–1945). Instead of the previously accepted starting date of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident on July 7, 1937, the Chinese Communist Party defined the war’s starting date as the Mukden Incident on September 18, 1931, which triggered the Japanese Kwantung Army’s invasion of Manchuria. Since the 1980s, scholars from Manchuria have demanded a fourteen-year war timeline to encompass the invasion of their homeland. By the 1990s, other scholars took notice and started to counter with claims that the eight-year timeline was the more accurate. Subsequently, a fierce “date debate” emerged between the two sides that was only resolved by the 2017 proclamation from the Ministry of Education.

Emily Matson demonstrates that the decision to set China’s World War II timeline at fourteen years was not merely a top-down decision, but was influenced by decades of Manchurian scholarship on the war. China’s Date Debate recenters Manchuria as a region of critical importance for China’s national identity today and the implications of this “date debate” on the Chinese Communist Party’s domestic legitimacy and international image.

Emily Matson is Adjunct Professor of History at Georgetown University, a Stephen M. Kellen Term Member at the Council on Foreign Relations, and a recent fellow for the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Project on the Future of U.S.-China Relations.