Choosing Your Battles

Regular price €49.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Christopher Gelpi
A01=Peter D. Feaver
Active duty
Americans
Anecdotal evidence
Author_Christopher Gelpi
Author_Peter D. Feaver
Bomb
Calculation
Case study
Category=JPS
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Charles Moskos
Civil-military relations
Coefficient
Cold War
Conventional wisdom
Cost-benefit analysis
Criticism
Democratic peace theory
Determinant
Dover test
Dummy variable (statistics)
Effectiveness
Elite
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Estimation
Finding
Follow-up
Foreign policy
Foreign policy of the United States
Great power
Humanitarian intervention
Indication (medicine)
Inference
Literature
Logit
Military elite
Military operation
Military service
National interest
National security
Our Choice
Paul Wolfowitz
Peacekeeping
Percentage
Policy
Policy debate
Powell Doctrine
Prediction
Princeton University Press
Probability
Public opinion
Realpolitik
Refusal
Reservist
Respondent
Result
Saddam Hussein
Security interest
Selection bias
Sensitivity analysis
Somalia
Statistical significance
Suggestion
Terrorism
Trade-off
United States Armed Forces
United States Department of State
War
War effort
War studies
Weapon of mass destruction
Willingness to accept
World War I
World War II

Product details

  • ISBN 9780691124278
  • Weight: 397g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 235mm
  • Publication Date: 11 Sep 2005
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war, showing how civil-military debates and concerns about sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign policy in profound ways.
Peter D. Feaver is Alexander F. Hehmeyer Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Duke University. He is the author of "Armed Servants" and "Guarding the Guardians" as well as coeditor of "Soldiers and Civilians". Christopher Gelpi is Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University. He is the author of "The Power of Legitimacy" (Princeton).

More from this author