Citizen’s Guide to the Political Psychology of Voting

Regular price €46.99
A01=David P. Redlawsk
A01=Michael W. Habegger
Affective Intelligence
Affective Intelligence Theory
American electorate studies
American National Election Study
Author_David P. Redlawsk
Author_Michael W. Habegger
Candidate Information
Category=JP
Clinton Presidency
Correct Vote
Electoral College Victory
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Explain Voter Behavior
FBI Director James Comey
Greater Task Demands
Information Environment
Internal Revenue Service
Intuitive Strategies
Iowa State Fair
Lower Quality Decisions
Macomb County
Milton Lodge
motivated reasoning
Partisan Identity
political advertising
political decision theory
political identity effects
Political Psychologists
political voting psychology
Private Email Server
rational choice limitations
Rational Voter
Rational Voting Model
Retrospective Voter
Secretary Of State
Trump Voters
voter cognitive strategies
voter decision-making
voter information processing

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138193994
  • Weight: 208g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 17 Apr 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

In the run-up to a contentious 2020 presidential election, the much-maligned American voter may indeed be wondering, “How did we get here?” A Citizen’s Guide to the Political Psychology of Voting offers a way of thinking about how voters make decisions that provides both hope and concern. In many ways, voters may be able to effectively process vast amounts of information in order to decide which candidates to vote for in concert with their ideas, values, and priorities. But human limitations in information processing must give us pause. While we all might think we want to be rational information processors, political psychologists recognize that most of the time we do not have the time or the motivation to do so. The question is, can voters do a “good enough” job even if they fail to account for everything during the campaign? Evidence suggests that they can, but it isn’t easy. Here, Redlawsk and Habegger portray a wide variety of voter styles and approaches—from the most motivated and engaged to the farthest removed and disenchanted—in vignettes that connect the long tradition of voter survey research to real life voting challenges. They explore how voters search for political information and make use of it in evaluating candidates and their positions. Ultimately, they find that American voters are reasonably competent in making well-enough informed vote choices efficiently and responsibly. For citizen voters as well as students and scholars, these results should encourage regular turnout for elections now and in the future.

David P. Redlawsk is James R. Soles Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science and International Relations at the University of Delaware. He previously taught at Rutgers and the University of Iowa. He has many years of practical political experience, having lost and won elections for local office in New Jersey, and led a county party organization in Iowa, organizing the county’s Iowa Caucuses for 2004.

Michael W. Habegger is an instructor and Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Political Science & International Relations at the University of Delaware and serves as the Editorial Assistant for the International Journal of Public Opinion Research. His research lies at the intersection of democracy and the Internet, broadly, and social media practices and the concepts of subjectivity and the public sphere, specifically.