Coalescent Argumentation

Regular price €50.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Michael A. Gilbert
agreement-based argument analysis
argument communication
Argument Modalities
Argumentation Theory
argumentative
ASG
Author_Michael A. Gilbert
Category=CFA
Category=CFG
Category=GPF
Category=QDTL
Classical Logical Mode
Coalescent Argumentation
conflict resolution strategies
Contemporary Argumentation Theory
dialogic negotiation
dispute
Dispute Partner
DWC
emotional
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
face
Face Goals
feminist argumentation
Football Game
goals
Informal Logic
intuitive decision making
Minor Premiss
mode
modes
moves
multi-modal reasoning
National Debate Tournament
non-logical
Non-logical Modes
partner
Persuasion Dialogue
Pragma Dialectic Approach
Propositionalizable Entities
Pure Inquiry
Synonymic Alternative
Task Goals
Trudy Govier
Ultraviolet Rays
Van Eemeren
Violated
Young Male Scholar

Product details

  • ISBN 9780805825206
  • Weight: 330g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Feb 1997
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Coalescent Argumentation is based on the concept that arguments can function from agreement, rather than disagreement. To prove this idea, Gilbert first discusses how several components--emotional, visceral (physical) and kisceral (intuitive) are utilized in an argumentative setting by people everyday. These components, also characterized as "modes," are vital to argumentative communication because they affect both the argument and the resulting outcome.

In addition to the components/modes, this book also stresses the goals in argumentation as a means for understanding one's own and one's opposer's positions. Gilbert argues that by viewing positions as complex human events involving a variety of communicative modes, we are better able to find commonalities across positions, and, therefore, move from conflict to resolution. By focusing on agreement and shared goals in all modes, arguers can coalesce diverse positions and more easily distinguish between minor or unrelated differences and core disagreements. This permits much greater latitude for locating shared beliefs, values, and attitudes that will lead to conflict resolution.

More from this author