Communities of Individuals

Regular price €96.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Michael J. R. Cross
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
anarchism
Aristotelian ethics
Author_Michael J. R. Cross
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=DSBH
Category=HPS
Category=JHBA
Category=JPA
Category=QDTS
Communitarian
communitarianism
community
COP=United Kingdom
critique of communitarianism theory
debate
Delivery_Pre-order
Dialectical
dialectical method
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
feminist political theory
group agency theory
Language_English
Liberal
liberalism
PA=Temporarily unavailable
political philosophy
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
Sartre
social ontology
softlaunch
Theory

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138703506
  • Weight: 660g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 219mm
  • Publication Date: 14 Sep 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
This title was first published in 2001: This book examines the liberal-communitarian debate from a new perspective. Communitarians argue that liberal theory neglects the significance of communities for the lives of their members. An examination of that argument reveals that there are deficiencies in the communitarian account of community. Identifying and remedying those deficiencies is the key concern of this book. Uniquely, this book addresses the deficiencies using Sartre's anarchist theory derived largely but not exclusively from an interpretation of the Critique of Dialectical Reason. Sartre champions the individual yet criticises liberalism. The tension arising from these two apparently disparate positions makes for a fruitful argument, enhanced by the connections made with Aristotelian and feminist theory, Hobbes and Rousseau. Finally, a method is developed for inquiring into the nature of associations which, it is argued, should interest communitarians concerned to avoid deficiencies in their account of community.

More from this author