Concept Formation in Social Science (Routledge Revivals)

Regular price €38.99
A01=William Outhwaite
adler
Author_William Outhwaite
bhaskar
Category=JHBA
Category=PDA
Category=QD
Cognitive Interests
conceptual frameworks in sociology
definition
Der Logische Aufbau Der Welt
Deryck Beyleveld
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
eq_society-politics
Evaluative Meaning
Fireman
Follow
Future Practice
hermeneutics
Holds
idealist
max
Nominal Definitions
Nuclear Physics
positivist theory
Post-war
rationalism in science
real
Real Definition
realism
realist philosophy
roy
Social Sciences
Social Structures
sociological methodology
Sociological System Theories
Stipulative Definitions
Strong
Theory Ta
transcendental
Transcendental Arguments
Transcendental Idealism
Verstehende Sociologists
Violate
Weber's Account
Weber's Methodological Individualism
Weberian analysis
webers
Weber’s Account
Weber’s Methodological Individualism

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415611268
  • Weight: 490g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Aug 2011
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days

Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock

10-20 Working Days: On Backorder

Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting

We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!

First published in 1983, this book examines the problems of concept formation in the social sciences, and in particular sociology, from the standpoint of a realistic philsophy of science. Beginning with a discussion of positivistic, hermeneutic, rationalist and realistic philsophies of science, Dr Outhwaite argues that realism is best able to furnish rational criteria for the choice and specification of social scientific concepts. A realistic philosophy of science therefore acts as his reference point for the dialectical presentation of alternative accounts.