Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science

Regular price €62.99
Quantity:
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
a priori
A01=David J. Stump
Arthur Pap
Author_David J. Stump
C. I. Lewis
Carnap
Cassirer
Category=PBB
Category=PDA
Category=QDH
Category=QDHR
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTL
Classical Newtonian Mechanics
Conceptual Change
Confirmational Holism
Constitutive Elements
constitutive principles
conventionalism in physics
Deflationary Strategy
Draw Back
dynamic a priori in scientific theory
epistemology of science
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
Euclid's Parallel Postulate
Euclid’s Parallel Postulate
Geometric Conventionalism
geometry
Hyperbolic Geometry
Ian Hacking
Indispensability Argument
Inertial Frame
Interdisciplinary Coalition
John Dewey
Kant
Kantian
Klein's Erlangen Program
Klein’s Erlangen Program
logical empiricism
Logical Positivism
Logical Positivist Account
Mathematical Entities
Michael Friedman
Nagel's Account
Nagel’s Account
Newton's Laws
non-Euclidean Geometries
Parallel Postulate
Petri Dish
philosophy of mathematics
Poincare
Priori Knowledge
Quine
Quinean
Quinean Holism
Reichenbach
scientific revolutions theory
Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Successful Empirical Theory
Synthetic Distinction
Thomas Kuhn
Underdetermination Arguments
Uniform Rectilinear Motion

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138346697
  • Weight: 285g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 14 Aug 2018
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In this book, David Stump traces alternative conceptions of the a priori in the philosophy of science and defends a unique position in the current debates over conceptual change and the constitutive elements in science. Stump emphasizes the unique epistemological status of the constitutive elements of scientific theories, constitutive elements being the necessary preconditions that must be assumed in order to conduct a particular scientific inquiry. These constitutive elements, such as logic, mathematics, and even some fundamental laws of nature, were once taken to be a priori knowledge but can change, thus leading to a dynamic or relative a priori. Stump critically examines developments in thinking about constitutive elements in science as a priori knowledge, from Kant’s fixed and absolute a priori to Quine’s holistic empiricism. By examining the relationship between conceptual change and the epistemological status of constitutive elements in science, Stump puts forward an argument that scientific revolutions can be explained and relativism can be avoided without resorting to universals or absolutes.

David J. Stump is a philosopher of science at the University of San Francisco, USA. He is co-editor, with Peter Galison, of The Disunity of Science, and is author of numerous journal articles on the history and philosophy of science.

More from this author