Conceptual Investigation of Justice

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Kyle Johannsen
Author_Kyle Johannsen
Bad Brute Luck
Bad Option Luck
Basic Structure Restriction
Brute Luck
Category=JPA
Category=QDTS
Christine Sypnowich
conceptual analysis in political theory
Contemporary Egalitarians
David Miller
Democracy
Democratic Legitimacy
Difference Principle
distributive justice analysis
Egalitarianism
egalitarianism debates
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equality
Fact-Insensitivity Thesis
fairness and democracy
Fundamental Justice
G.A. Cohen
Harshness Objection
Hypothetical Contract Situation
Hypothetical Insurance
Hypothetical Insurance Market
Ideal Theory
institutional legitimacy
Institutional Rightness
John Rawls
Justice
Kok-Chor Tan
Laura Valentini
Lea Ypi
Liberalism
Luck Egalitarianism
Luck Equality
Marxism
Maximum Average Utility
Narrow Justice
Nicholas Vrousalis
Option Luck
Original Position
Pablo Gilabert
Personal Prerogative
Politcal Theory
Political Philosophy
political philosophy theory
Political Theory: Methods and Approaches
Procedure Independent Standard
Reasonable Disagreement
Shlomi Segall
Society's Ethos
Society’s Ethos
Substantive Fairness
Sufficiency Threshold
Unchosen Inequality
value pluralism

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138736009
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 02 Oct 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Conceptual analysis has fallen out of favor in political philosophy. The influence of figures like John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin has led political philosophy to focus on questions about what should be done, and to ignore questions about the usage of words.

In this book, Kyle Johannsen calls for renewed attention to the manner in which the word ‘justice’ is and should be used. Focusing on the late work of G.A. Cohen, Johannsen argues that debates over both the content and scope of egalitarian justice are, to a large extent, really just conceptual. Whereas some philosophers have been using the term ‘justice’ to refer to one among a plurality of values, others have been using it to refer to institutional rightness. Though the latter use of ‘justice’ is presently more dominant, he argues that much is to be gained from thinking of justice as one value among many. Doing so sheds light on the nature of both democracy and legitimacy, and, paradoxically, makes better sense of the idea that justice is ‘the first virtue of institutions’.

Kyle Johannsen is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at Trent University, Canada. He is primarily interested in political philosophy, metaethical issues that pertain to political philosophy, and animal ethics. His work has appeared in such journals as Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Res Publica, Ethical Perspectives, and Socialist Studies.

More from this author