Contesting the Politics of Genocidal Rape

Regular price €198.40
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Debra B. Bergoffen
Author_Debra B. Bergoffen
bodies
bosnian
Bosnian Serb Soldiers
Category=GTM
Category=JBFK2
Category=JBSF1
Category=JBSF11
Category=JHBA
Category=NHTZ
Category=QDTS
Consent Theory
Dragoljub Kunarac
epistemic authority
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
feminist legal theory
gendered violence legal analysis
Genocidal Rape
Genuine Consent
human
Human Rights
Human Rights Discourses
Human Rights Documents
human rights jurisprudence
Human Rights Paradigm
Hutu Men
ICTY Verdict
Incest Taboo
international criminal law
Invulnerable Body
Lingua Franca
Linguae Francae
Masculine Sovereignty
phenomenology of the body
Profound Reality
Rape Campaign
Rape Spectacles
rights
self-determination
serb
sexual
Sexual Contract
Sexual Self-determination
sexual violence in conflict
time
Tutsi Women
vulnerable
Vulnerable Body
war
War Time
War Time Rape

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415891271
  • Weight: 430g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 24 Oct 2011
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Rape, traditionally a spoil of war, became a weapon of war in the ethnic cleansing campaign in Bosnia. The ICTY Kunarac court responded by transforming wartime rape from an ignored crime into a crime against humanity. In its judgment, the court argued that the rapists violated the Muslim women’s right to sexual self-determination. Announcing this right to sexual integrity, the court transformed women’s vulnerability from an invitation to abuse into a mark of human dignity. This close reading of the trial, guided by the phenomenological themes of the lived body and ambiguity, feminist critiques of the autonomous subject and the liberal sexual/social contract, critical legal theory assessments of human rights law and institutions, and psychoanalytic analyses of the politics of desire, argues that the court, by validating women’s epistemic authority (their right to establish the meaning of their experience of rape) and affirming the dignity of the vulnerable body (thereby dethroning the autonomous body as the embodiment of dignity), shows us that human rights instruments can be used to combat the epidemic of wartime rape if they are read as de-legitimating the authority of the masculine autonomous subject and the gender codes it anchors.

Debra B. Bergoffen is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at George Mason University.

More from this author