Home
»
Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
Regular price
€77.99
603 verified reviews
100% verified
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Our Delivery Time Frames Explained
2-4 Working Days: Available in-stock
14-28 Working Days: On Backorder
Will Deliver When Available: On Pre-Order or Reprinting
We ship your order once all items have arrived at our warehouse and are processed. Need those 2-4 day shipping items sooner? Just place a separate order for them!
Close
A01=Shihab al-Din Ahmad ibn Idris al-Qarafi al-Maliki
Author_Shihab al-Din Ahmad ibn Idris al-Qarafi al-Maliki
Category=LAFS
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
Product details
- ISBN 9780300191158
- Weight: 499g
- Dimensions: 140 x 210mm
- Publication Date: 07 Jul 2017
- Publisher: Yale University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
The first and much-needed English translation of a thirteenth-century text that shaped the development of Islamic law in the late middle ages.
Scholars of Islamic law can find few English language translations of foundational Islamic legal texts, particularly from the understudied Mamluk era. In this edition of the Tamyiz, Mohammad Fadel addresses this gap, finally making the great Muslim jurist Shihab al-Din al-Qarafi’s seminal work available to a wider audience. Al-Qarafi’s examination of the distinctions among judicial rulings, which were final and unassailable, legal opinions, which were advisory and not binding, and administrative actions, which were binding but amenable to subsequent revision, remained standard for centuries and are still actively debated today.
Scholars of Islamic law can find few English language translations of foundational Islamic legal texts, particularly from the understudied Mamluk era. In this edition of the Tamyiz, Mohammad Fadel addresses this gap, finally making the great Muslim jurist Shihab al-Din al-Qarafi’s seminal work available to a wider audience. Al-Qarafi’s examination of the distinctions among judicial rulings, which were final and unassailable, legal opinions, which were advisory and not binding, and administrative actions, which were binding but amenable to subsequent revision, remained standard for centuries and are still actively debated today.
Shihab al‑Din al‑Qarafi (d. 1285) was an Islamic legal theorist. Mohammad H. Fadel is associate professor and former Canada Research Chair for the Law and Economics of Islamic Law (2006–2015) at the University of Toronto.
Criterion for Distinguishing Legal Opinions from Judicial Rulings and the Administrative Acts of Judges and Rulers
€77.99
