Crossing Gender in Shakespeare

Regular price €63.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=James W. Stone
ation
Author_James W. Stone
battlefi
Category=DDA
Category=DSB
Category=DSBD
Category=DSG
Chafi Ng
Cleopatra's Death
Cleopatra’s Death
confl
Copular Mixing
Cross Garters
cross-dressing analysis
dress
early modern drama
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_poetry
feminist readings of Shakespearean plays
Fi Lial Duty
Fl Esh
gender performativity
Gendered Double Bind
Hysterica Passio
Incorporate Conclusion
Jove's Bird
Jove’s Bird
male
Male Dress
Marie Le Marcis
masculinism
masculinity studies
Mockery King
night
OED
Othello's Anxieties
Othello’s Anxieties
Ovid's Hermaphroditus
Ovid’s Hermaphroditus
psychoanalytic literary criticism
Pure
richard
Richard II
roman
sexual difference theory
Shakespeare's Comic Heroines
Shakespeare’s Comic Heroines
twelfth
Twelfth Night
Unwieldy Sceptre
Violated
Virgin Sacrifi Ce
Woman's Part
Woman’s Part
Younger Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9780415896511
  • Weight: 380g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 16 May 2011
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In this book, Stone effects a return to gender, after many years of neglect by Twenty-First-Century critics, via a methodology of close reading that foregrounds moments of sexual decentering and disequilibrium within the text and in the interstices of the dialogue between Shakespeare and his critics. Issues addressed range from the cross dressing of Viola and Imogen to the cross gartering of Malvolio, the sound of "un" and the uncanny lyric narcissism of Richard II, Hamlet’s misogyny, androgyny, and the poison of marital/political "union," Othello’s fears of impotence, rumors of Antony’s emasculation versus the militant yet nurturing triumphalism of Cleopatra’s suicide, and Posthumus’s hysterical reaction to the "woman’s part" in himself and his compensatory fantasies of parthenogenesis. Stone unpacks ideologically powerful but unsustainable male claims to self-identity and sameness, set over against man’s type-gendering of women as the origin of divisive sexual difference, discord, and the dissolution of marriage. Men who blame women for the difference that divides and weakens their sense of unity and sameness to oneself are unconscious that the uncanny feminine is not outside the masculine, its reassuring canny opposite; it is inside the masculine, its uncanny difference from itself.

James W. Stone is a visiting fellow in the Department of English Language and Literature at the National University of Singapore.      

More from this author