A01=Matthew Landauer
academic
accountability
advice
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
analogy
analysis
ancient greece
athenian
athens
Author_Matthew Landauer
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=DB
Category=JPA
Category=JPH
classism
communication
COP=United States
counsel
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
democracy
demos
disagreement
elite
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Format=BB
Format_Hardback
global
greek
Herodotus
historical
history
international
Language_English
majority
orator
PA=Available
philosopher
philosophy
Plato
political
politician
politics
prejudice
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
research
scholarly
social structure
softlaunch
thinkers
threat
Tyranny
tyrant
western world
working class
Product details
- ISBN 9780226654010
- Format: Hardback
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 05 Sep 2019
- Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
We often talk loosely of the "tyranny of the majority" as a threat to the workings of democracy. But, in ancient Greece, the analogy of demos and tyrant was no mere metaphor, nor a simple reflection of elite prejudice. Instead, it highlighted an important structural feature of Athenian democracy. Like the tyrant, the Athenian demos was an unaccountable political actor with the power to hold its subordinates to account. And like the tyrant, the demos could be dangerous to counsel since the orator speaking before the assembled demos was accountable for the advice he gave.
With Dangerous Counsel, Matthew Landauer analyzes the sometimes ferocious and unpredictable politics of accountability in ancient Greece and offers novel readings of ancient history, philosophy, rhetoric, and drama. In comparing the demos to a tyrant, thinkers such as Herodotus, Plato, Isocrates, and Aristophanes were attempting to work out a theory of the badness of unaccountable power; to understand the basic logic of accountability and why it is difficult to get right; and to explore the ways in which political discourse is profoundly shaped by institutions and power relationships. In the process they created strikingly portable theories of counsel and accountability that traveled across political regime types and remain relevant to our contemporary political dilemmas.
Matthew Landauer is assistant professor of political science at the University of Chicago.
