Defending A High School Graduation Test
Regular price
€39.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
10th Grade Test
Acceptable Professional Standards
accountability policy analysis
Ann Smisko
assessment
Basic Skills Competencies
Category=JNDH
Category=JNLC
code
Curricular Validity
cut
Cut Score
Cynthia A. Ward
education
Education Agencies
educational measurement
Educator Review
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Exit Level Test
Field Test Items
forum
GI Forum
Graduation Test
High School Graduation Test
high stakes testing legal standards
Initial Passing Rates
Jon S. Twing
Keith L. Cruse
legal defensibility
lep
LEP Student
limited English proficiency assessment
MCAS Test
OTL
Patricia Denny
Professional Development
psychometric validation
Rosalie P. Porter
score
Single Test Score
standardized achievement tests
state
State Assessment Programs
State Test Directors
student
TAAS Test
Test Development Process
texas
Texas Education Agency
Texas Education Code
Texas State Board
William A. Mehrens
William D. Schafer
Product details
- ISBN 9780805897401
- Weight: 200g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 01 Nov 2000
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
This special issue is a case study of a recent legal challenge to a graduation test, GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency. Its purpose is to provide updated, relevant information to the many statewide and district testing programs, measurement professionals, and policymakers currently involved with the implementation of new educational standards and tests. The GI Forum Court's decision provides a road map for creating legally defensible graduation tests, and by analogy, may also provide useful guidance for other high stakes uses of standardized achievement tests. The GI Forum case is an extension of the landmark Debra P. v. Turlington case.
