Demise of the Reasonable Man

Regular price €64.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Michael Saltman
Author_Michael Saltman
barotse
Barotse Judges
Category=JB
Category=JHM
comparative legal anthropology
cross-cultural jurisprudence
cultural context of legal standards
cultures
Direct Democracy
Elk Lodge
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
ethnographic case studies
gemeinschaft
Hillingdon London Borough Council
Individual Kibbutz
Institutional Rights
judges
judicial decision making
Kibbutz Members
Kibbutz Movement
legal
legal pluralism
Legal Predictability
London Graving Dock
Long Run Parity
Michael Saltman
modern
Modern Legal System
normative frameworks
Primitive Legal Systems
realists
Reasonable Maintenance
Reasonable Man
Red Owl
scandinavian
Scandinavian Legal Realists
Scandinavian Realists
Secretary Of State
Situation Sense
Spontaneous Order
Stroud's Judicial Dictionary
Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary
system
Times Law Report
type
War Time
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781412855914
  • Weight: 272g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Jun 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Judges in most societies often resort to resolving disputes by means of applying a criterion of reasonableness. In The Demise of the'Reasonable Man' Michael Saltman explores the ways in which reasonableness varies from one legal culture to another, defined by the relative presence or absence of centralized political power.

In non-politically centralized societies, Saltman says, judges seek meanings underlying human behavior, and try to place reasonableness within a societal and cultural context. This is possible because primitive societies are relatively homogenous in their values and tend towards consensus when determining what constitutes reasonable behavior. In contrast, modern judges resort to standards of reasonableness only when the legal standard is unclear. Saltman contrasts judges in politically centralized societies, who, in the absence of such consensus, have the authority to determine, on the basis of that authority, what constitutes reasonableness. This rich volume references case studies drawn from ethnographic fieldwork, historical sources, and law reports to demonstrate differences in judicial attitudes toward reasonableness.

Michael Saltman is professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of Haifa, Israel. He has done field research among the Kipsigis of Kenya and within the Kibbutz Movement. His books include The Kipsigis: A Case Study in Changing Customary Law, Land, and Territoriality and Social Critique and Commitment.

More from this author